Models the domain as a structured ontology
Objects, links, properties and types represent the domain rather than remaining implicit in prose.
Ontology platform capability benchmark
Assess your platform against 24 capabilities spanning induced-versus-compiled sourcing, authoritative rule extraction, deterministic execution, auditability, portability, operations and trust. You will get an immediate score and a preview of the prioritised improvement plan.
Matrix-derived presets
Prefill all 24 answers from the published comparison, then review and adjust them for the product and deployment you are assessing.
Illustrative public-material benchmark, not a vendor self-assessment or certification.
Where the model comes from
This category measures the induced-versus-compiled divide: whether the rulebook was written down by engineers observing the business, or compiled from the documents that govern it.
Objects, links, properties and types represent the domain rather than remaining implicit in prose.
Represents permitted, required, blocked, routed and escalated states, not only numerical outputs.
Obligations, conditions and computations are lifted from laws, contracts, policies and standards.
Structure is derived from the source automatically rather than modelled manually from the top down.
Any output can be followed back to the specific clause of the authority that produced it.
The entire governing text is captured rather than a prompted or sampled subset.
How the rule runs
Identical inputs yield identical, reproducible outputs every time.
Produces proof that the computation faithfully applies the rule, not merely a test pass-rate.
Behaviour remains stable when an underlying probabilistic model is upgraded or swapped.
A model may propose, but it does not sit on the live decision or release.
The system cannot invent a rule or value that is absent from the source.
Over the lifecycle
A regulator or court can see why the output is the correct application of the governing rule.
Amended sources are reprocessed and changes surfaced against the prior version.
Compiled rules can be lifted out, combined and federated rather than locked to one platform.
The platform resolves which version of the rule was in force at the date of an action.
The surrounding stack
End-user applications and review interfaces are generated on the same governed primitives.
Who may do what is enforced reliably, ideally as part of the model itself.
Many formats and legacy systems can be integrated with write-back where required.
Workflows and agents can be triggered by events across the platform.
Supports correlation, link analysis, anomaly detection and weak-signal discovery across messy sources.
Regulated and high-stakes use
Can prove deterministically that an action was permitted in consequential settings.
The platform has been demonstrated in live, consequential operation.
Sovereignty and maturity
Operation continues if a foreign model or vendor is withdrawn.
The deployed surface, operational history and reference base support production adoption.
Assessment progress
Complete every capability for a fair, comparable score.