SynapseLayer
Operome - StGB consolidated, offences against life (§211 to §221)
Three scopes encoded under the current principles: the merged §211/§212 killing scope, the transformed §218, §221 · Mordmerkmale struck per the annotation; the §218 base offence excluded per the annotation, the edited paragraph 2 chapeau encoded · the §221 paragraph 2 qualification live per the markup, recorded and not gating the base composite
{Variable} input · [Computable] act / derived · «if … end if» condition · struck excluded · word-for-word dissection; the law is reconstructable from the substrate

§211, §212 · Unlawful killing (merged scope)

UnlawfulKilling · provenance StGB 211, 212 · one live element; Mordmerkmale and penalties struck
Source (English, unofficial)
Operome markup - original text encoded
§211 [struck whole]: (1) The murderer shall be punished with imprisonment for life. (2) A murderer is whoever, out of a lust to kill, for sexual gratification, out of greed or otherwise base motives, treacherously or cruelly or with means dangerous to the public, or in order to enable or conceal another offence, kills a person. §212 [merged heading: and manslaughter]: (1) Whoever kills a person [struck: without being a murderer shall be punished as a manslaughterer with imprisonment for not less than five years]. [Struck: (2) In particularly serious cases imprisonment for life shall be imposed.] [Annotation: combined since motives are not relevant for AI.]
«if UnlawfulKilling is true»§211 (1) The murderer shall be punished with imprisonment for life. (2) A murderer is whoever, out of a lust to kill, for sexual gratification, out of greed or otherwise base motives, treacherously or cruelly or with means dangerous to the public, or in order to enable or conceal another offence, kills a person. §212 (1) {Actor} who «if {KillsPerson} is true»kills a person «end if» without being a murderer shall be punished as a manslaughterer with imprisonment for not less than five years. (2) In particularly serious cases imprisonment for life shall be imposed.«end if»
Annexes
Computables
[UnlawfulKilling] = KillsPerson is true
Business rules
idkindactorverb / predicatebody
UKL-R01actActorKillsPerson is true
UKL-R80actActormerged scope (per the markup and the annotation “combined since motives are not relevant for AI”): Sections 211 and 212 are carried as one scope; every Mordmerkmal of Section 211(2) and the Totschlag penalty structure of Section 212 are struck, leaving the shared objective core, the killing of a person; the Mord/Totschlag distinction grades punishment after the fact and adds nothing to a prospective constraintUnlawfulKilling is true
UKL-P0prohibitionActornot realisenot UnlawfulKilling
Tatbestand dissected to the Merkmal
Source phraseDoctrinal rolePrimitiveRuleRequires
WhoeverTätersubjekt{Actor}in scope
kills a personMerkmal{KillsPerson}UKL-R01is true
the Mordmerkmale; both penalty structuresgrading— excluded —struck whole
Variables appendix
VariableInputValuesCascadeSurface form (source words)
{Actor}ReferenceSessionany person (the actor)
{KillsPerson}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} kills a person
Reconstruction from the substrate
Committed by any person (the actor) who: {Actor} kills a person.
Assembled only from the variable surface forms (including the actor) and the computable structure carried in the XSD, not from the source column. It should read as the offence. This is the recoverability test: the law is reverse-derivable from the substrate.
Dependent assessments (reactive invalidation)
AssessmentDepends onInvalidationTrigger effect
[UnlawfulKilling]KillsPersonfalseFinal composite. Re-evaluates on any input change; cannot resolve true while any input is unknown.
prohibition (UKL-P0)[UnlawfulKilling]re-derivesThe PrimeRule prohibition holds whenever the composite is true; re-derives on any change.
Decision tree
PHASE 1: gather inputs (Session) ├─ {Actor} ├─ {KillsPerson} ↓ PHASE 2: evaluate act / intermediate computables ↓ PHASE 3: evaluate the objective conditions └─ [UnlawfulKilling] = KillsPerson is true ↓ VERDICT (PrimeRule) ├─ [UnlawfulKilling] is true → objective conditions realised → conduct PROHIBITED (subject to permissions / exceptions) └─ [UnlawfulKilling] is falsenot realised
Recursion / re-entry notes
No runtime re-entry. The operome is a single forward evaluation: inputs → act computable(s) → Tatbestand composite → prohibition verdict. Attempt and preparation, where the section provides for them, are separate operomes, not re-entries.
Circularity check
• [UnlawfulKilling] depends on ; none refer back to [UnlawfulKilling]. No definitional cycle.
• Each computable reduces to input Booleans; the graph is a DAG and topologically sortable. Tristate is monotone: any unknown input holds the composite at unknown rather than forcing a verdict.
Questionnaire
#CascadeVariableQuestion / promptInput
Q1Session{Actor}Who or what is the actor? Any natural person, legal person, or non-human system. Canonical home: PrimeRule.?Reference
Q2Session{KillsPerson}Element/Datum: {Actor} kills a person.?Boolean
Flags
Merged scope (annotated)  §§211 and 212 carried as one scope per the markup; the headings merged in the source document. The Mordmerkmale and both penalty structures struck; the single live element is the shared objective core. “Combined since motives are not relevant for AI” recorded verbatim.
Consumers  [UnlawfulKilling] is the reference target of the §129a directed-at catalogue and the §138 catalogue text; the simplest and most consequential prohibition in the corpus.
Treatment  §211 Operomise; §212 Operomise (merged); §213, §216, §217 Excluded.

§218 · Termination of pregnancy (transformed)

TerminationOfPregnancy · provenance StGB 218 · non-consensual and endangering termination encoded; base offence excluded per annotation
Source (English, unofficial)
Operome markup - original text encoded
(1) [Base offence excluded per the annotation “not part of general ethics rules”:] Whoever terminates a pregnancy shall be punished with imprisonment for up to three years or a fine. Acts whose effect occurs before completion of the implantation of the fertilised egg in the uterus do not count as termination of pregnancy within the meaning of this law. (2) Whoever terminates a pregnancy and [struck: In particularly serious cases the penalty shall be imprisonment for six months to five years. A particularly serious case generally exists] where the offender 1. acts against the will of the pregnant woman, or 2. recklessly causes the danger of death or of serious health damage to the pregnant woman. (3) [Struck: penalty for the pregnant woman herself.] (4) [Struck: attempt; the pregnant woman is not punished for the attempt.]
«if TerminationOfPregnancy is true»(1) Whoever terminates a pregnancy shall be punished with imprisonment for up to three years or a fine. Acts whose effect occurs before completion of the implantation of the fertilised egg in the uterus do not count as termination of pregnancy within the meaning of this law. (2) {Actor} who «if {TerminatesPregnancy} is true»terminates a pregnancy «end if» and In particularly serious cases the penalty shall be imprisonment for six months to five years. A particularly serious case generally exists where {Actor} 1. «if {AgainstWillOfPregnantWoman} is true»acts against the will of the pregnant woman «end if», or 2. «if {RecklesslyCausesDanger} is true»recklessly causes «end if» «if {DangerOfDeath} is true»the danger of death «end if» «if {DangerOfSeriousHealthDamage} is true»or of serious health damage «end if» to the pregnant woman. (3) Penalty for the pregnant woman herself. (4) Attempt; the pregnant woman is not punished for the attempt.«end if»
Annexes
Computables
[EndangermentLeg] = RecklesslyCausesDanger is true and (DangerOfDeath is true or DangerOfSeriousHealthDamage is true) [TerminationOfPregnancy] = TerminatesPregnancy is true and (AgainstWillOfPregnantWoman is true or EndangermentLeg is true)
Business rules
idkindactorverb / predicatebody
TPY-R01actActorTerminatesPregnancy is true
TPY-R02actActorAgainstWillOfPregnantWoman is true
TPY-R03actActorRecklesslyCausesDanger is true
TPY-R04conditionNoneDangerOfDeath is true
TPY-R05conditionNoneDangerOfSeriousHealthDamage is true
TPY-R80conditionNonedefinition (paragraph 1 sentence 2, carried): acts whose effect occurs before completion of the implantation of the fertilised egg in the uterus do not count as termination of pregnancy within the meaning of this law; bounds {TerminatesPregnancy}TerminatesPregnancy is true
TPY-R81actActortransformation (per the annotation “not included because not part of general ethics rules”): the base offence of paragraph 1 sentence 1, terminating a pregnancy as such, is excluded, consistent with Sections 218a to 219b Excluded; the encoded offence is the paragraph 2 chapeau as edited, termination against the will of the pregnant woman or with reckless endangerment of her; paragraphs 3 and 4 struckTerminationOfPregnancy is true
TPY-P0prohibitionActornot realisenot TerminationOfPregnancy
Tatbestand dissected to the Merkmal
Source phraseDoctrinal rolePrimitiveRuleRequires
WhoeverTätersubjekt{Actor}in scope
{Actor} terminates a pregnancyMerkmal{TerminatesPregnancy}TPY-R01is true
{Actor} acts against the will of the pregnant womanMerkmal{AgainstWillOfPregnantWoman}TPY-R02is true
{Actor} recklessly causes the danger to the pregnant womanMerkmal{RecklesslyCausesDanger}TPY-R03is true
the danger of deathMerkmal{DangerOfDeath}TPY-R04is true
the danger of serious health damageMerkmal{DangerOfSeriousHealthDamage}TPY-R05is true
pre-implantation carve-outDefinition— bounds {TerminatesPregnancy} —TPY-R80carried
base offence (1) s.1; (3); (4)base offence / variants— excluded —per annotation / struck
Variables appendix
VariableInputValuesCascadeSurface form (source words)
{Actor}ReferenceSessionany person (the actor)
{AgainstWillOfPregnantWoman}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} acts against the will of the pregnant woman
{DangerOfDeath}Booleantrue / false / unknownSessionthe danger of death
{DangerOfSeriousHealthDamage}Booleantrue / false / unknownSessionthe danger of serious health damage
{RecklesslyCausesDanger}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} recklessly causes the danger to the pregnant woman
{TerminatesPregnancy}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} terminates a pregnancy
Reconstruction from the substrate
Committed by any person (the actor) who: {Actor} terminates a pregnancy and ({Actor} acts against the will of the pregnant woman or ({Actor} recklessly causes the danger to the pregnant woman and (the danger of death or the danger of serious health damage))).
Assembled only from the variable surface forms (including the actor) and the computable structure carried in the XSD, not from the source column. It should read as the offence. This is the recoverability test: the law is reverse-derivable from the substrate.
Dependent assessments (reactive invalidation)
AssessmentDepends onInvalidationTrigger effect
[EndangermentLeg]RecklesslyCausesDanger, DangerOfDeath, DangerOfSeriousHealthDamagefalseRecomputes when any input changes; propagates into the composite.
[TerminationOfPregnancy]TerminatesPregnancy, AgainstWillOfPregnantWoman, EndangermentLegfalseFinal composite. Re-evaluates on any input change; cannot resolve true while any input is unknown.
prohibition (TPY-P0)[TerminationOfPregnancy]re-derivesThe PrimeRule prohibition holds whenever the composite is true; re-derives on any change.
Decision tree
PHASE 1: gather inputs (Session) ├─ {Actor} ├─ {AgainstWillOfPregnantWoman} ├─ {DangerOfDeath} ├─ {DangerOfSeriousHealthDamage} ├─ {RecklesslyCausesDanger} ├─ {TerminatesPregnancy} ↓ PHASE 2: evaluate act / intermediate computables ├─ [EndangermentLeg] = RecklesslyCausesDanger is true and (DangerOfDeath is true or DangerOfSeriousHealthDamage is true) ↓ PHASE 3: evaluate the objective conditions └─ [TerminationOfPregnancy] = TerminatesPregnancy is true and (AgainstWillOfPregnantWoman is true or EndangermentLeg is true) ↓ VERDICT (PrimeRule) ├─ [TerminationOfPregnancy] is true → objective conditions realised → conduct PROHIBITED (subject to permissions / exceptions) └─ [TerminationOfPregnancy] is falsenot realised
Recursion / re-entry notes
No runtime re-entry. The operome is a single forward evaluation: inputs → act computable(s) → Tatbestand composite → prohibition verdict. Attempt and preparation, where the section provides for them, are separate operomes, not re-entries.
Circularity check
• [TerminationOfPregnancy] depends on [EndangermentLeg]; none refer back to [TerminationOfPregnancy]. No definitional cycle.
• Each computable reduces to input Booleans; the graph is a DAG and topologically sortable. Tristate is monotone: any unknown input holds the composite at unknown rather than forcing a verdict.
Questionnaire
#CascadeVariableQuestion / promptInput
Q1Session{Actor}Who or what is the actor? Any natural person, legal person, or non-human system. Canonical home: PrimeRule.?Reference
Q2Session{AgainstWillOfPregnantWoman}Element/Datum: {Actor} acts against the will of the pregnant woman.?Boolean
Q3Session{DangerOfDeath}Element/Datum: the danger of death.?Boolean
Q4Session{DangerOfSeriousHealthDamage}Element/Datum: the danger of serious health damage.?Boolean
Q5Session{RecklesslyCausesDanger}Element/Datum: {Actor} recklessly causes the danger to the pregnant woman.?Boolean
Q6Session{TerminatesPregnancy}Element/Datum: {Actor} terminates a pregnancy.?Boolean
Flags
Transformation (prominent)  The base offence, terminating a pregnancy as such, is excluded per the annotation “not included because not part of general ethics rules”, consistent with §§218a to 219b Excluded. The encoded offence is the edited paragraph 2 chapeau: termination against the will of the pregnant woman, or with reckless endangerment of her life or health. The serious-cases penalty machinery is struck; the circumstances are offence-constituting here, not grading.
Definition carried  The pre-implantation carve-out of (1) sentence 2 bounds {TerminatesPregnancy} and is carried as TPY-R80; the strike markers around (1) are incomplete in the source document, the annotation governs the base offence and the definition serves the live (2).
Treatment  §218 Operomise (transformed); §§218a, 218b, 218c, 219, 219a, 219b Excluded.

§221 · Abandonment

AbandonmentEndangerment · provenance StGB 221 · (1) encoded; (2) live qualification recorded; (3)-(4) struck
Source (English, unofficial)
Operome markup - original text encoded
(1) Whoever 1. places a person in a helpless situation, or 2. abandons a person in a helpless situation although he has the person in his care or is otherwise obliged to assist the person, and thereby exposes the person to the danger of death or of serious health damage, shall be punished with imprisonment for three months to five years. (2) [Struck: Imprisonment for one to ten years shall be imposed] where the offender 1. commits the act against his child or a person entrusted to him for upbringing or for care in the conduct of life, or 2. causes serious health damage to the victim through the act. (3) [Struck: result-of-death aggravation.] (4) [Struck: less serious cases.]
«if AbandonmentEndangerment is true»(1) {Actor} who 1. «if {PlacesInHelplessSituation} is true»places a person in a helpless situation «end if», or 2. «if {AbandonsInHelplessSituation} is true»abandons a person in a helpless situation «end if» although «if {PersonInCare} is true»{Actor} has the person in the care of {Actor} «end if» «if {OtherwiseObligedToAssist} is true»or is otherwise obliged to assist «end if», and thereby «if {ExposesToDangerOfDeath} is true»exposes the person to the danger of death «end if» «if {ExposesToDangerOfSeriousHealthDamage} is true»or of serious health damage «end if» shall be punished with imprisonment for three months to five years. (2) Imprisonment for one to ten years shall be imposed where {Actor} 1. «if {AgainstOwnChild} is true»commits the act against the child of {Actor} «end if» «if {AgainstEntrustedPerson} is true»or a person entrusted to {Actor} for upbringing or for care in the conduct of life «end if», or 2. «if {CausesSeriousHealthDamage} is true»causes serious health damage to the victim through the act «end if». (3) Result-of-death aggravation. (4) Less serious cases.«end if»
Annexes
Computables
[AbandonmentLeg] = AbandonsInHelplessSituation is true and (PersonInCare is true or OtherwiseObligedToAssist is true) [AggravatedCircumstances] = AgainstOwnChild is true or AgainstEntrustedPerson is true or CausesSeriousHealthDamage is true [Exposure] = ExposesToDangerOfDeath is true or ExposesToDangerOfSeriousHealthDamage is true [AbandonmentEndangerment] = (PlacesInHelplessSituation is true or AbandonmentLeg is true) and Exposure is true
Business rules
idkindactorverb / predicatebody
ABE-R01actActorPlacesInHelplessSituation is true
ABE-R02actActorAbandonsInHelplessSituation is true
ABE-R03conditionNonePersonInCare is true
ABE-R04conditionNoneOtherwiseObligedToAssist is true
ABE-R05actActorExposesToDangerOfDeath is true
ABE-R06actActorExposesToDangerOfSeriousHealthDamage is true
ABE-R07conditionNoneAgainstOwnChild is true
ABE-R08conditionNoneAgainstEntrustedPerson is true
ABE-R09actActorCausesSeriousHealthDamage is true
ABE-R80actActorqualification (paragraph 2, live per the markup with only the penalty head struck, against the corpus convention of striking gradings; followed as marked and recorded as an editorial decision): the act against the actor's own child or a person entrusted for upbringing or care in the conduct of life, or causing serious health damage to the victim, qualifies the offence; carried as [AggravatedCircumstances], consumed by this rule and not gating the base compositeAggravatedCircumstances is true
ABE-P0prohibitionActornot realisenot AbandonmentEndangerment
Tatbestand dissected to the Merkmal
Source phraseDoctrinal rolePrimitiveRuleRequires
WhoeverTätersubjekt{Actor}in scope
{Actor} places a person in a helpless situationMerkmal{PlacesInHelplessSituation}ABE-R01is true
{Actor} abandons a person in a helpless situationMerkmal{AbandonsInHelplessSituation}ABE-R02is true
{Actor} has the person in the care of {Actor}Merkmal{PersonInCare}ABE-R03is true
{Actor} is otherwise obliged to assist the personMerkmal{OtherwiseObligedToAssist}ABE-R04is true
{Actor} thereby exposes the person to the danger of deathMerkmal{ExposesToDangerOfDeath}ABE-R05is true
{Actor} thereby exposes the person to the danger of serious health damageMerkmal{ExposesToDangerOfSeriousHealthDamage}ABE-R06is true
the act is committed against the child of {Actor}Merkmal{AgainstOwnChild}ABE-R07is true
the act is committed against a person entrusted to {Actor} for careMerkmal{AgainstEntrustedPerson}ABE-R08is true
{Actor} causes serious health damage to the victim through the actMerkmal{CausesSeriousHealthDamage}ABE-R09is true
qualification circumstances (paragraph 2)qualification (live)[AggravatedCircumstances]ABE-R80recorded
(3) result-of-death; (4) less serious casesgrading— excluded —struck
Variables appendix
VariableInputValuesCascadeSurface form (source words)
{AbandonsInHelplessSituation}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} abandons a person in a helpless situation
{Actor}ReferenceSessionany person (the actor)
{AgainstEntrustedPerson}Booleantrue / false / unknownSessionthe act is committed against a person entrusted to {Actor} for care
{AgainstOwnChild}Booleantrue / false / unknownSessionthe act is committed against the child of {Actor}
{CausesSeriousHealthDamage}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} causes serious health damage to the victim through the act
{ExposesToDangerOfDeath}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} thereby exposes the person to the danger of death
{ExposesToDangerOfSeriousHealthDamage}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} thereby exposes the person to the danger of serious health damage
{OtherwiseObligedToAssist}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} is otherwise obliged to assist the person
{PersonInCare}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} has the person in the care of {Actor}
{PlacesInHelplessSituation}Booleantrue / false / unknownSession{Actor} places a person in a helpless situation
Reconstruction from the substrate
Committed by any person (the actor) who: ({Actor} places a person in a helpless situation or ({Actor} abandons a person in a helpless situation and ({Actor} has the person in the care of {Actor} or {Actor} is otherwise obliged to assist the person))) and ({Actor} thereby exposes the person to the danger of death or {Actor} thereby exposes the person to the danger of serious health damage).
Assembled only from the variable surface forms (including the actor) and the computable structure carried in the XSD, not from the source column. It should read as the offence. This is the recoverability test: the law is reverse-derivable from the substrate.
Dependent assessments (reactive invalidation)
AssessmentDepends onInvalidationTrigger effect
[AbandonmentLeg]AbandonsInHelplessSituation, PersonInCare, OtherwiseObligedToAssistfalseRecomputes when any input changes; propagates into the composite.
[AggravatedCircumstances]AgainstOwnChild, AgainstEntrustedPerson, CausesSeriousHealthDamagefalseRecomputes when any input changes; propagates into the composite.
[Exposure]ExposesToDangerOfDeath, ExposesToDangerOfSeriousHealthDamagefalseRecomputes when any input changes; propagates into the composite.
[AbandonmentEndangerment]PlacesInHelplessSituation, AbandonmentLeg, ExposurefalseFinal composite. Re-evaluates on any input change; cannot resolve true while any input is unknown.
prohibition (ABE-P0)[AbandonmentEndangerment]re-derivesThe PrimeRule prohibition holds whenever the composite is true; re-derives on any change.
Decision tree
PHASE 1: gather inputs (Session) ├─ {AbandonsInHelplessSituation} ├─ {Actor} ├─ {AgainstEntrustedPerson} ├─ {AgainstOwnChild} ├─ {CausesSeriousHealthDamage} ├─ {ExposesToDangerOfDeath} ├─ {ExposesToDangerOfSeriousHealthDamage} ├─ {OtherwiseObligedToAssist} ├─ {PersonInCare} ├─ {PlacesInHelplessSituation} ↓ PHASE 2: evaluate act / intermediate computables ├─ [AbandonmentLeg] = AbandonsInHelplessSituation is true and (PersonInCare is true or OtherwiseObligedToAssist is true) ├─ [AggravatedCircumstances] = AgainstOwnChild is true or AgainstEntrustedPerson is true or CausesSeriousHealthDamage is true ├─ [Exposure] = ExposesToDangerOfDeath is true or ExposesToDangerOfSeriousHealthDamage is true ↓ PHASE 3: evaluate the objective conditions └─ [AbandonmentEndangerment] = (PlacesInHelplessSituation is true or AbandonmentLeg is true) and Exposure is true ↓ VERDICT (PrimeRule) ├─ [AbandonmentEndangerment] is true → objective conditions realised → conduct PROHIBITED (subject to permissions / exceptions) └─ [AbandonmentEndangerment] is falsenot realised
Recursion / re-entry notes
No runtime re-entry. The operome is a single forward evaluation: inputs → act computable(s) → Tatbestand composite → prohibition verdict. Attempt and preparation, where the section provides for them, are separate operomes, not re-entries.
Circularity check
• [AbandonmentEndangerment] depends on [AbandonmentLeg], [AggravatedCircumstances], [Exposure]; none refer back to [AbandonmentEndangerment]. No definitional cycle.
• Each computable reduces to input Booleans; the graph is a DAG and topologically sortable. Tristate is monotone: any unknown input holds the composite at unknown rather than forcing a verdict.
Questionnaire
#CascadeVariableQuestion / promptInput
Q1Session{AbandonsInHelplessSituation}Element/Datum: {Actor} abandons a person in a helpless situation.?Boolean
Q2Session{Actor}Who or what is the actor? Any natural person, legal person, or non-human system. Canonical home: PrimeRule.?Reference
Q3Session{AgainstEntrustedPerson}Element/Datum: the act is committed against a person entrusted to {Actor} for care.?Boolean
Q4Session{AgainstOwnChild}Element/Datum: the act is committed against the child of {Actor}.?Boolean
Q5Session{CausesSeriousHealthDamage}Element/Datum: {Actor} causes serious health damage to the victim through the act.?Boolean
Q6Session{ExposesToDangerOfDeath}Element/Datum: {Actor} thereby exposes the person to the danger of death.?Boolean
Q7Session{ExposesToDangerOfSeriousHealthDamage}Element/Datum: {Actor} thereby exposes the person to the danger of serious health damage.?Boolean
Q8Session{OtherwiseObligedToAssist}Element/Datum: {Actor} is otherwise obliged to assist the person.?Boolean
Q9Session{PersonInCare}Element/Datum: {Actor} has the person in the care of {Actor}.?Boolean
Q10Session{PlacesInHelplessSituation}Element/Datum: {Actor} places a person in a helpless situation.?Boolean
Flags
Scope  Paragraph 1 whole: the placing leg and the abandonment leg with its duty circumstances, over the exposure pair. Struck: the penalties, (3) and (4).
Live qualification (recorded)  (2)'s circumstances are live with only the penalty head struck, against the convention that struck gradings elsewhere (§225(3), §129(5)); followed as marked. Carried as [AggravatedCircumstances] consumed by rule ABE-R80, recorded and not gating the base composite, so the offence stands on paragraph 1 alone.
Treatment  §221 is Operomise-tagged; §222 is Excluded.
SynapseLayer operome extraction · Lisbon, 10 June 2026